replacement for netscrape mail

[Rodent of Unusual Size]

Bob Bell wrote:
> 
> I assume IMAP isn't an option?  It would be a much better solution.

i disagree.  been there, done that, got seriously pissed and
frustrated. :-)

> FWIW, mutt does have POP support.

i never said it didn't; in fact, i think i said i used it
for text-only mail.  its failing is the handling of rich-format
mail, and that's just imho.