Frees/wan setup problems
Cole Tuininga
colet at code-energy.com
Fri Feb 28 10:34:36 EST 2003
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 10:25, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 15:03, Cole Tuininga wrote:
>
> > # iptables -nL -t nat
> > Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
> > target prot opt source destination
> >
> > Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
> > target prot opt source destination
> > SNAT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 !192.168.0.0/16
> > to:63.127.199.26
>
> OK, this is sort of nit-picky, but just for the heck of it, let's
change
> this rule on both gateways to be more specific. On the 192.168.1.0/24
> side, let's change this to -d !192.168.2.0/24 and on the 192.168.2.0
> side, change it to -d !192.168.1.0/24. That may also help the routing.
Ok - no problem. I tried it, to no avail. Out of curiosity, how would
I write the rule if I wanted to VPN in another network, say .3?
--
If we quit voting will they all go away?
Cole Tuininga
Lead Developer
Code Energy, Inc
colet at code-energy.com
PGP Key ID: 0x43E5755D
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list