cygwin
David Roberts
droberts at mc.com
Fri Jan 17 10:15:08 EST 2003
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Jerry Feldman stated in their Email:
gaf> From: Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
gaf> To: discuss at gnhlug.org
gaf> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:24:18 -0500
gaf> Subject: Re: cygwin
gaf>
gaf> On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:22:50 -0500
gaf> pll at lanminds.com wrote:
gaf>
gaf> > I'm pretty sure it goes in a .profile (or etc.). I've not used
gaf> > Cygwin extensively, but it seemed that when you were operating
gaf> > in the Cygwin environment, you were effectively in a real
gaf> > UNIX-like environment, and things behaved "properly", i.e. not
gaf> > like Windows.
gaf> One of my students downloaded cygwin in class tonight, and I had
gaf> a chance to play with it after class. He wanted to know where the
gaf> C compiler was. After looking at the setup program, most of my
gaf> questions were answered. The last timne I downloaded Cygwin, it
gaf> did not have X support and you did not have a choice of what you
gaf> downloaded. On the current version you get to chose the packages.
gaf> My question about the PATH variable is answered.
gaf>
gaf> Another issue is that the Unix server at Northeastern is going
gaf> away in the spring, and the school is pondering how to teach
gaf> Unix. While I would prefer a dual boot (or VMWare) solution with
gaf> Windows and Linux, Cygwin appears to be a pretty decent solution
gaf> if you can't have a real Unix system, and a good solution for
gaf> students who only have Windows on their home computers.
<RANT>
I know this might start a flame war, but IMNSHO ANY school
which is trying to teach a Unix class, but is not running
Unix system to teach it on, is NOT worth my paying the them
the money ($$$/yr) for the privilege. This reminds me in
a way of a Bait-N-Switch program: the school catalog says
"we teach UNIX" - but it's on top of Micro$oft... I have
run into enough situations where "Unix-on-top-of-Windows"
environments blow up that I now refuse to to be a party to
it, all my "Windows" systems have been converted to dual
boot merely because of my previous "education".
I realize you have to work with what you are given, but if
I had to teach a college level UNIX class I would probably
have a prerequisite the people in the class *RUN* some
flavor of Unix on their systems (with the latest versions
of Linux out there this is not only "free", but is easy to
manage as well). A week or two of "Introduction to
Unix/Linux" and a few in-class/lab install fests would get
the whole class on a somewhat level playing ground, and
ease them into UNIX at the same time.
I would also have a pointed discussion with any school
administrator who felt they could teach Unix in such a
bastardized environment. You could get away with it if
you were merely scratching the surface (only teaching the
basic UNIX commands), but any in-depth topics would be
prone to failure at some point and the Windows brainwash
should be broken as well (again, IMNOHO).
</RANT>
I shall now retire to my corner and await my whipping...
--
"Linux: Because a PC is a terrible thing to waste."
-- As seen on the 'net --
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list