Adverts (was: Funny Linux animation)
Tom Buskey
tom at buskey.name
Wed Jan 29 23:45:09 EST 2003
bscott at ntisys.com said:
>On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, at 10:08pm, travis at scootz.net wrote:
>
>> When banner/skyscraper/box/button ads are paying 0.0000003 per impression
>> it's time to look for a better source of revenue.
If the companies could pay for traditional advertising per impression,
I'm sure they would. It's very difficult to measure TV/Billboard/
Print/Radio ad results. Click throughs are measurable. I wonder what
the porn industry's success with popups, etc is?
> Indeed. Which is one of the things I am trying to get at. People seem to
>object to adverts. Yet at the same time, they complain when other forms of
>cost recovery are attempted.
Sometimes ads can be negative. I'll never buy something over the
phone. I might actively avoid the retail store/product associated with the
telemarketer too. My mom will never get MCI long distance because of
their relentless pursuit.
There are better ways to advertise. I like the ads on google for
instance. I use to love the old Beagle Brothers ads for Apple ][
computers. I got a 2nd edition of a book as a PDF for
free and I'm going to buy the 3rd edition as a result.
>Footnotes
>---------
>[1] If you have not read Robert Heinlein's classic _The Moon is a Harsh
> Mistress_, you may not understand the significance of "TANSTAAFL".
> Briefly: In an isolated colony with limited resources[2], failure
> to understand the underlying principle of TANSTAAFL will kill you[3].
And he got the idea from bars that used to serve a free lunch, but sold
drinks at a higher price. All of the bar food was pickled, salted, etc.
It's a great saying. I remember seeing Tanstaffl Manufacturing Co....
--
-------
Tom Buskey
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list