IBM suing over PeeCee patents?

[Michael O'Donnell]

> Have we seen anything about this from a *real* publication?
> "The Inquirer" is entertainment, not journalism.  Furthermore,
> that "story" is so weak on facts it is practically non-existent.


Agreed.  Unfortunately, the Inquirer's hit rate on this
sort of melodramatic junk is just high enough that you
(well, I, at least) can't rule them out automatically.

Heh.  Wouldn't this be juicy in light of the SCO nonsense?

Ok - sorry - I won't mention this again unless we hear
more from some other source(s).