suggestions for CVS use
pll at lanminds.com
pll at lanminds.com
Wed May 7 14:45:17 EDT 2003
>>>>> On Wed, 7 May 2003, "pll" == pll at lanminds.com wrote:
pll> Not that I've heard of. OSS development is inherently
pll> different from the type of development which ClearCase solves
pll> problems for.
>>>>> On 7 May 2003, "Kevin" == Kevin D. Clark wrote:
Kevin> How's that?
Disclaimer: I'm not saying that CVS can not be used in enterprise
development environments successfully, or in place of
ClearCase.
ClearCase use assumes that centralized development with
high-speed access to the VOBS and Views, and this is a requirement if
you're using dynamic Views.
CVS assumes sporatic connections and extremely decentralized development,
and only requires network connectivity when accessing the repository.
pll> ClearCase also requires NFS/SMB connected access, which is a
pll> major pain IMO.
Kevin> Is this true if you exclusively use snapshot views?
If you're using snapshot views exclusively, then no. However, if
you're development environment is structured such that everyone uses
snapshot views, I'd argue that CVS would have been a much more
worthwhile investment of your money, since you aren't able to take
advantage of a lot of CC functionality.
Personally, I'm a little leary of snapshot views. Granted, I have no
experience with them, since the last time I actively used CC, they
didn't exist. However, they came to exist as a work-around to enable
CC to work in a windows environment where SMB connections would
sproratically reset or hang and cause data corruption.
Also, my understanding is that snapshot views are available only
under Windows. Is this incorrect?
--
Seeya,
Paul
--
Key fingerprint = 1660 FECC 5D21 D286 F853 E808 BB07 9239 53F1 28EE
It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing,
but I'm really actively waiting for all my problems to go away.
If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list