Reply-To (was: piercing corporate)
bscott at ntisys.com
bscott at ntisys.com
Sat Feb 7 22:53:43 EST 2004
On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, at 6:00am, invalid at pizzashack.org wrote:
> I therefore advocate that you not set a reply-to header.
Well, I can't speak for anyone else, but I set "Reply-To" on my outgoing
messages to this list to "discuss at gnhlug.org" precisely *because* I want
replies to my messages to this list to go to this list. I *want* all the
discussion to be public. I almost never want private replies (and on the
rare occasions I do, I ask for them, and set Reply-To accordingly). The
power of collaboration is essential to Linux, GNHLUG, and, I dare say, most
worthwhile human endeavors.
All too often, I find private replies on public lists did not need to be
private, and the community loses something by making them private. Case in
point: The message you sent contained valuable information and nothing I
could see as needing to be "private". So why send it private?
So, as far as *I'm* concerned, my headers are correct. I want replies to
go to <gnhlug at discuss.org>. That's what Reply-To is for. I don't ask you
to change yours; please don't ask me to change mine.
> Yes, yes, I realize I should check my headers before I hit the send key
> ...
Yes, you should.
You should also change the "Subject" line when hijacking a thread.
There's also the whole "email address in a public email forum" flamewar
that happened a few months ago.
I note that you, personally, Derek, seem to advocate netiquette and
community involvement only when it involves no effort on your part. If it
means *you* need to do more work, then it's okay to ignore it. That
*REALLY* pisses me off. Maybe it's just a bad coincidence, but I really
can't help but notice a pattern here.
I say this mainly because I value your knowledge, insights, and opinions,
on this list and elsewhere, and I would hate to lose them. If you were just
some net.random, I would just tell you to take a hike.
--
Ben Scott <bscott at ntisys.com>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do |
| not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. |
| All information is provided without warranty of any kind. |
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list