SSL Cert problem with Outbreak
    Cole Tuininga 
    colet at code-energy.com
       
    Thu Feb 12 06:53:30 EST 2004
    
    
  
First off, thank you Ben, Travis, and Bob for responding - I'll give
your suggestions a try.  Have I mentioned recently that I love the linux
community?  8)
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 00:21, bscott at ntisys.com wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, at 4:40pm, colet at code-energy.com wrote:
> > Here's the problem.  Outlook is complaining every time they connect about
> > the fact that the certificate isn't signed by a recognized authority.
> 
>   Wow, for once, Microsoft did something right.  I'm sure it was an 
> oversight.
I'm curious about your comment here.  I agree that M$ did something
right in that they gave the user the notification that the certificate
chain didn't end at a known good cert authority.  However, it seems to
me like they should give the user the ability to accept the certificate
anyway.
Are you saying that M$ was right in *not* allowing that?  If so, how
come?
-- 
"... one of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that,
 lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of
 their C programs."  --  Robert Firth
Cole Tuininga
Lead Developer
Code Energy, Inc
colet at code-energy.com
PGP Key ID: 0x43E5755D
    
    
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list