md5sum of RH9 (shrike) disk 1
Steven Knight
steven.knight at unh.edu
Sat Feb 21 21:13:42 EST 2004
* On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 20:25, Greg Rundlett wrote:
> I have downloaded RHL 9, using wget, and I'm having trouble with the
> md5sum of disk 1 (shrike-i386-disc1.iso) I've downloaded the file
> several times, most recently from rpmfind.net and I keep coming up with
> the following md5sum:
>
> [greg at brie disks]$ md5sum shrike-i386-disc1.iso
> 400c7fb292c73b793fb722532abd09ad shrike-i386-disc1.iso
I get the same md5sum value that you do :
$ md5sum shrike-i386-disc1.iso
400c7fb292c73b793fb722532abd09ad shrike-i386-disc1.iso
>
>
> Here are the md5sums given on the rpmfind website (same as RedHat's site):
>
> 34048ce4cd069b624f6e021ba63ecde5 shrike-i386-disc1.iso
> 6b8ba42f56b397d536826c78c9679c0a shrike-i386-disc2.iso
> af38ac4316ba20df2dec5f990913396d shrike-i386-disc3.iso
> 0727c51ab359dafa9ab31e0c50958aa6 shrike-SRPMS-disc1.iso
> 2ddd8e6a8502869cd2e78d47590b9be1 shrike-SRPMS-disc2.iso
> f378cf68b22c3b9a64c86b5067511630 shrike-SRPMS-disc3.iso
The md5sum value for disc 1 is wrong, though I have no idea why.
Perhaps RedHat released an updated iso image but never updated the
MD5SUM file ???
I would say that your iso image for disc 1 is good and ready to go.
Is there a reason that you are installing RHL 9? Why not install fedora
core 1 ( aka RHL 10 ) ? Just a thought.
Bye,
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven Knight steven.knight at unh.edu IM : skkataim
and tho' We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are,--
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
-- Ulysses by Alfred Lord Tennyson
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list