Desktop Linux (fwd)
Michael Costolo
mcostolo at yahoo.com
Wed Feb 25 12:57:09 EST 2004
--- "Kenneth E. Lussier" <klussier at sentito.com> wrote:
> I would agree with Maddog's assessment on this point. "Cool Software" in
> a family setting is usually defined in a few ways:
>
> 1) The most popular games that all of little Johny's friends have
> 2) Children's educational software (although I think that teaching your
> 4-year old Perl is a good thing ;-)
> 3) The applications that Mom and Dad use at work.
You have to wait until they're 4 to teach them Perl? I know you've got me on the
games. But there are alternatives to that. But what applications do Mom and Dad
use at work that do not have *equivalents* on a Linux box?
> Also, note that "cool software" does not have to mean that the software
> itself does cool things. In a general home setting, "cool software" is
> the software/programs/games/apps that everyone you know has.
Generically speaking? If that were truly the case, wouldn't you suppose that would
leave Apple rather userless?
> The perception to many people is that their access provider will not support you
if > you use anything other than the listed applications
The super clueless are perhaps a lost cause in any event.
> The average home user wants a technical support number, not a mailing
> list. Besides, if their problem is a networking problem, or they can't
> get their e-mail to work right, then they have no help.
Certainly true. But the point was that an alternate support system *does* exist.
Not in the same form, but so what?
> Yes, it really does depend on the use of Linux at work. People want to
> use what they are familiar with. They use a computer at work far more
> then they do at home, so the one at work is where they gain their
> experience.
But at work what to they *do*? Spreadsheets, documents, email, web-browsing?
(Probably in the reverse order.) Regardless of platform, they all work pretty much
the same. Do you honestly think people in general are so Microsoft-braindead that
they don't believe that they can compose an email if they don't have Outlook? Or
write a letter if they don't have Word?
Is it *really* that bad?
-Mike-
=====
"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it"
-George Bernard Shaw
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list