Comcast blocking port 25? (not what you think)
Travis Roy
travis at scootz.net
Mon May 10 11:24:01 EDT 2004
bscott at ntisys.com wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 2004, at 10:53am, travis at scootz.net wrote:
>
>>>>Yah, that's what I'm going to have to do.. BLAH.. stupid comcast.
>>>
>>>
>>> Get used to it. More and more ISPs are adding this. And I cannot say I
>>>entirely disagree with the policy.
>>
>>Why?
>
>
> Mail abuse. A great deal of spam and other mail abuse comes from
> computers on consumer feeds that are incorrectly configured as a mail relay
> (don't ask me how, but it happens more often then you would think), or have
> been compromised by some kind of malware and are being used as same. At the
> same time, SMTP was designed to move mail between static, well-connected
> systems. Hosts on dynamic, consumer feeds do not meet that definition.
My parents are not running any kind of server.
> It
> makes more sense for such hosts to submit mail to a smart host which can do
> the job right.
That is exactly what they are trying to do, send the mail to my server
so I can do the job of dealing with their mail.
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list