Migration from Windows to Linux
John Abreau
jabr at blu.org
Thu Oct 28 02:33:00 EDT 2004
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 23:51, Fred wrote:
> What would be really "mega cool" is to see an addressbook protocol
> folded into the IMAP spec. Then your addressbook would be
> client-agnostic as well.
>
> And while we're at it, bookmarks, calendars, ... !
>
> Oh well -- do you think if I hammered out the RFCs for this the clients
> would come? :-)
LDAP already provides addressbook functionality, and it does a good job
of it. I don't see a need to reinvent the wheel yet again. And I feel
it would be a bad idea to add bloatware to IMAP.
I'm not aware of any decent open-source calendar servers, and I suppose
a case could be made for adding that to the IMAP spec. As I understand
it, MS Exchange layers its calendar functionality on top of ordinary
mail mesages by using a set of "magic" mail headers.
As for bookmark management, I could imagine using LDAP or WebDAV to
implement that, but I really don't see it fitting into the IMAP spec.
--
John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix
Email jabr at blu.org / WWW http://www.abreau.net / PGP-Key-ID 0xD5C7B5D9
PGP-Key-Fingerprint 72 FB 39 4F 3C 3B D6 5B E0 C8 5A 6E F1 2C BE 99
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/private/gnhlug-discuss/attachments/20041028/ab34882d/attachment.bin
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list