Power consumption (was: free to good home, 19" CRT)
Bill McGonigle
bill at bfccomputing.com
Mon Apr 18 00:33:00 EDT 2005
On Apr 17, 2005, at 13:26, Brian wrote:
> IMO, you can't really, truly, justify a purchase like that
> economically,
> environmentally, OR politically.
Yeah, but it's sexy, saves desk space, and it's a good enough excuse
for SWMBO.
More practically, I've never had an LCD lose focus on me. I've
scrapped four CRT's in the past decade (dual monitor setup c.1993) due
to focus issues which cannot be fixed economically. At least I'm not
replacing flyback transformers anymore! If there's a reconditioner
who's interested in blurry monitors I've not found him yet.
So... presumably I'll be replacing the LCD's less frequently than the
CRT's (if the bulb lasts) which will put fewer pounds of total material
and quite a bit less lead on the landfill. If the argument surrounds a
single upgrade it's harder to defend, but reality is stuff fails at
frequency f and costs rate x to fix or y to replace and that needs to
be in the calculation. It's probably more costly than the electricity
the unit will use over the lifetime of the unit.
-Bill
P.S. There are some really good deals on big analog-input panels out
there during the move to DVI. The signal rides a good cable and is
digitized onboard anyhow - if there is any quantization noise error in
the display either I can't see it or it's outside the performance
envelope of the panel itself.
-----
Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668
bill at bfccomputing.com Mobile: 603.252.2606
http://www.bfccomputing.com/ Pager: 603.442.1833
AIM: wpmcgonigle Skype: bill_mcgonigle
For fastest support contact, please follow:
http://bfccomputing.com/support_contact.html
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list