DNS misc
Paul Lussier
p.lussier at comcast.net
Tue Apr 19 09:19:00 EDT 2005
Benjamin Scott <dragonhawk at iname.com> writes:
>> The real down side of forwarding is that DNS search order breaks
>> (this might be fixed in BIND 9, but was definitely broken with BIND
>> 4.x -- I haven't tried it since then).
>
> This has always worked for me just fine with BIND 8.x. I'm even
> kinda surprised this would ever care about forwarding, as the
> domain search list is implemented by the resolver library, not
> named. But BIND 4.x did a lot of funky shit, so I'm not *totally*
> surprised. :)
IIRC, the problem was actually the listing of multiple search lines in
/etc/resolv.conf. The first search line was referenced, possibly the
second, but I believe the tertiary was ignored. FWIW, MS had a
similar problem too. Windows would allow you enter primary and
secondary name server, but then would ignore all subsequently listed
servers.
Hmmm, I wonder if they just ripped the BIND resolver library code and
ported it bug-for-bug ;)
--
Seeya,
Paul
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list