Question about spamassassin using MySQL
Bruce Dawson
jbd at codemeta.com
Tue Apr 26 10:21:01 EDT 2005
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 21:54 -0400, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> On Apr 25 at 3:13pm, Bruce Dawson wrote:
> > Steven: Thanks for the clarification. I was under the impression that the
> > milter is called only after the message had been received.
> Obviously, in order to do content analysis or other magic on a message, you
> have to receive the content. As I understand it, what these tools do is allow
> the SMTP "DATA" verb to be sent, and to receive some or all of the data from
> the sender. Then, before the SMTP result code 250 ("Message accepted for
> delivery") code is sent, the filter runs and makes a decision. If the message
> fails, an SMTP error status code is sent instead.
Hmmm. So milters actually won't be much good for reducing the amount of
bandwidth occupied by spam - most of the message comes through before a
decision is made.
My observation has been that some spammers don't wait for the 250 reply,
and will just cut the connection after sending the "dot" command.
--Bruce
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/private/gnhlug-discuss/attachments/20050426/b59a8f42/attachment.bin
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list