Question about spamassassin using MySQL

Bruce Dawson jbd at codemeta.com
Tue Apr 26 10:21:01 EDT 2005


On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 21:54 -0400, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> On Apr 25 at 3:13pm, Bruce Dawson wrote:
> > Steven: Thanks for the clarification. I was under the impression that the 
> > milter is called only after the message had been received.
>      Obviously, in order to do content analysis or other magic on a message, you 
> have to receive the content.  As I understand it, what these tools do is allow 
> the SMTP "DATA" verb to be sent, and to receive some or all of the data from 
> the sender.  Then, before the SMTP result code 250 ("Message accepted for 
> delivery") code is sent, the filter runs and makes a decision.  If the message 
> fails, an SMTP error status code is sent instead.

Hmmm. So milters actually won't be much good for reducing the amount of
bandwidth occupied by spam - most of the message comes through before a
decision is made.

My observation has been that some spammers don't wait for the 250 reply,
and will just cut the connection after sending the "dot" command.

--Bruce
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/private/gnhlug-discuss/attachments/20050426/b59a8f42/attachment.bin


More information about the gnhlug-discuss mailing list