Debian flamewar (plus general ranting)
Benjamin Scott
bscott at ntisys.com
Tue Feb 22 00:44:00 EST 2005
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, at 7:55am, pri.lugofnh at iadonisi.to wrote:
>> And the fact that BSD ports downloads, configures, builds, and installs
>> all the specified components *from source* leads BSD bigots into thinking
>> that the BSD ports packagers must be doing a much better job then Red Hat
>> or Debian packagers.
>
> Yeah, the source junkies never seem to take into account managing
> hundreds or even thousands of boxes. './configure;make;make install' gets
> old *real* fast in those situations.
At least BSD ports automates that much.
Really, though, I was referring to the fact that BSD ports (or Gentoo
portage) is not magically better at handling dependencies; rather, by
building everything locally, it bypasses the problem. Since the build
environment *is* the target environment, everything becomes much easier.
And, ideally, I suspect that is the way to go. Alas, "closed source"
software still plays far too big a role in my world for me to take that
route. And as soon as you introduce one pre-compiled binary into a "source
only" system, everything goes straight to hell in a zip file.
>> And, again, it's also largely responsible for why Windoze sucks so much.
>> ... it's a minor kind of miracle the thing ever works at all.
>
> Does it work at all? ;-)
Alas, yes, it does. If it was flat-out, dead-in-the-water broken I'd have
a much easier time pitching Linux. :-/
--
Ben Scott <bscott at ntisys.com>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do |
| not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. |
| All information is provided without warranty of any kind. |
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list