Dang! [Or, that was fun!]

[Bill Sconce]

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:47:05 -0500
Ted Roche <tedroche at tedroche.com> wrote:

> On Feb 24, 2005, at 12:02 AM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
> 
> > HOWEVER: one item of interest regarding meetings that is of paramount 
> > importance is... when to have them.  There was a general consensus of 
> > those who made it that Wednesdays aren't that hot, and that Thursdays 
> > would be preferable; currently looking at first or second Thursdays of 
> > the month.  How does everyone feel about that?  [Do we have any sort 
> > of mechanism in place for on-line voting?  Or shall I keep a tally?]


Oh brother.  One vote against...

The group should do whatever gets the turnout.  But Wednesdays were good.
Moving to Tuesdays or Thursdays will exclude me (I teach on Tuesdays and
Thursdays, at least for a while).  So do a couple of other potential
attendees.  Of course, there are probably other folks with the reverse
set of conflicts.  Inevitable... :)


 
> The Python SIG recently reviewed what dates were ideal and settled on 
> the third Wednesday to avoid the other LUGs.

And to avoid Tuesdays and Thursdays because three of the members had
conflicts.


> Looks like evasive maneuvers may be in order. What with the variability
> of the calendar, some overlap is inevitable.

True.  "You can't win.  You can't even break even."    :)

-Bill