mail archives
Benjamin Scott
bscott at ntisys.com
Tue Jan 25 19:58:01 EST 2005
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, at 8:25am, clark_k at pannaway.com wrote:
> Indeed, there was no discussion of whether this was an actual problem or
> not before this change was made. No discussion at all.
We needed a solution in a hurry and that was the best we could do.
Note that the action in question had nothing to do with Derek Martin's
bitching, but rather was due to an off-list issue with a party outside
GNHLUG.
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, at 9:08am, clark_k at pannaway.com wrote:
> This program is a filter that strips out email addresses. I hope that
> this program can be useful in addressing our current issue.
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, at 12:24am, bscott at ntisys.com wrote:
> A better solution was desired, but the resources (people, time, trust,
> server resources, installed software, etc.) did not exist. Likely still
> do not.
My remarks, quoted above, were intended to indicate that the problem is
not that we lack an implementation of search-and-replace.
If you want to volunteer a reliable server, with reliable power, with
available reliable bandwidth and a static IP address, all dedicated to
GNHLUG, open to people you may not know, and also create and supervise a
process where people can somehow be evaluated and approved for access, and
also take over general management of it all, then I'm sure something can be
arranged....
That's a bit harsh, but I'm trying to demonstrate that the problems are
many, and generally not technical in nature. :-(
--
Ben Scott <bscott at ntisys.com>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do |
| not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. |
| All information is provided without warranty of any kind. |
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list