htt daemon eating up my internet connection
Paul Dussault
pdussault at gwi.net
Mon Nov 28 22:05:00 EST 2005
Thanks everyone who responded. I have learned a lot and fixed the problem too.
Here's what I did:
[root at dionysus pdussault]# grep -Elr \\Whtt\\W /etc/rc.d/init.d
/etc/rc.d/init.d/IIim
Ah, it's IIim.
Then I used chkconfig to get rid of it.
Works great!
Thanks again to all.
Paul
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 11:19 am, gnhlug-discuss-request at mail.gnhlug.org
wrote:
> Send gnhlug-discuss mailing list submissions to
> gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> gnhlug-discuss-request at mail.gnhlug.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> gnhlug-discuss-admin at mail.gnhlug.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of gnhlug-discuss digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Threads and TCP/IP (Thomas Charron)
> 2. Re: Sound broken by Synaptic. Anyone else? Any thoughts (Bill
> Freeman) 3. Re: Threads and TCP/IP (Kevin D. Clark)
> 4. htt daemon eating up my internet connection (Paul Dussault)
> 5. RE: htt daemon eating up my internet connection (Brian)
> 6. Re: htt daemon eating up my internet connection (Andrew W. Gaunt)
> 7. Re: htt daemon eating up my internet connection (Andrew W. Gaunt)
> 8. Re: htt daemon eating up my internet connection (Bill McGonigle)
> 9. Re: htt daemon eating up my internet connection (Ben Scott)
> 10. Re: Threads and TCP/IP (Thomas Charron)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:24:17 -0500
> From: Thomas Charron <twaffle at gmail.com>
> To: gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org
> Subject: Re: Threads and TCP/IP
>
> ------=_Part_31355_27173049.1132680257288
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> On 11/21/05, Cole Tuininga <colet at code-energy.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 18:18 -0500, Thomas Charron wrote:
> > > Yes, one could say 'What about at the same time', but there really
> > > isn't such a thing.. ;-)
> >
> > Even on an SMP machine?
>
> For the most part, yes. Even with multiple processors, ONE of the
> processes is going to get to that memory first. ;-)
>
> > Just please, for the love of god, dont have multiple threads trying
> >
> > > to WRITE to the socket at the same time. Oh, it'll work.. But the
> > > data won't look pretty unless the data packets are REALLY small.
> >
> > *heh* Yeah - I know better than to try that. 8)
>
> In a prototype I wrote a long while ago, I accidently assumed that small
> packets would go out immediatly, with multiple threads. Every once and a
> while, the datastream got mangled becouse the buffers ended up with data
> being intermingled.
> As a side note, it IS perfectly ok to do this with datagram data. In my
> case, I had the application have the ability to use either, using the same
> structure, either streamed over TCP, or sent as UDP. Hence, my mistake..
> ;-= )
> It was an additional request later on in the development process, and
> caused me to have to rework some things a bit..
> Thomas
>
> ------=_Part_31355_27173049.1132680257288
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> <div><span class=3D"gmail_quote">On 11/21/05, <b
> class=3D"gmail_sendername"=
>
> >Cole Tuininga</b> <<a
> > href=3D"mailto:colet at code-energy.com">colet at code-=
>
> energy.com</a>> wrote:</span>
> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px
> 0= px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 18:18
> -050= 0, Thomas Charron wrote:<br>> Yes, one could say 'What about at
> the same= time', but there really
> <br>> isn't such a thing.. ;-)<br>Even on an SMP
> machine?</bl= ockquote>
> <div> </div>
> <div> For the most part, yes. Even with multiple processors,
> ON= E of the processes is going to get to that memory first.
> ;-)</div><br=
>
> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px
> 0= px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">> Just please,
> fo= r the love of god, dont have multiple threads trying<br>> to WRITE
> to th= e socket at the same time. Oh, it'll
> work.. But the <br>> data won't look pretty unless the data
> packets are REALLY small.<b= r>*heh* Yeah - I know better than
> to try that. 8)</bl= ockquote>
> <div> </div>
> <div> In a prototype I wrote a long while ago, I accidently assumed
> t= hat small packets would go out immediatly, with multiple threads.
> Eve= ry once and a while, the datastream got mangled becouse the buffers
> ended u= p with data being intermingled.
> </div>
> <div> </div>
> <div> As a side note, it IS perfectly ok to do this with datagram
> dat= a. In my case, I had the application have the ability to use
> either, = using the same structure, either streamed over TCP, or sent as
> UDP. H= ence, my mistake.. ;-)
> </div>
> <div> </div>
> <div> It was an additional request later on in the development
> proces= s, and caused me to have to rework some things a bit..</div>
> <div> </div>
> <div> Thomas</div><br> </div>
>
> ------=_Part_31355_27173049.1132680257288--
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> From: Bill Freeman <f at ke1g.mv.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:08:05 -0500
> To: Greg Rundlett <greg.rundlett at gmail.com>
> Cc: gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org
> Subject: Re: Sound broken by Synaptic. Anyone else? Any thoughts
>
> Greg Rundlett writes:
> > believed I was running Sarge after it became stable, I am in fact
> > still running testing (which means no security updates).
>
> I hadn't realized that. I guess that the laptop in question
> is pretty safe, since it runs no services, lives behind a
> firewall/router, and I don't even read mail on it. But I'll have to
> keep that in mind.
>
> You'ld think that security updates would have to be "tested".
>
> Bill
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> To: gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org
> Subject: Re: Threads and TCP/IP
> From: kevin_d_clark at comcast.net (Kevin D. Clark)
> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:20:23 -0500
>
> Thomas Charron writes:
> > On 11/21/05, Cole Tuininga wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 18:18 -0500, Thomas Charron wrote:
> >> > Yes, one could say 'What about at the same time', but there really
> >> > isn't such a thing.. ;-)
> >>
> >> Even on an SMP machine?
> >
> > For the most part, yes. Even with multiple processors, ONE of the
> > processes is going to get to that memory first. ;-)
>
> On SMP machines things happen simultaneously all the time. Things get
> intermingled a lot too. Even on uniprocessor machines things can seem
> to be happening simultaneously. So, you are wrong.
>
> I for one am really not comfortable with the cavilier manner that you
> are dispensing "advice" about threads programming.
>
> --kevin
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list