IDE RAID (was SCSI 'n other stuff)
Tom Buskey
tom at buskey.name
Wed Nov 30 11:51:02 EST 2005
On 11/30/05, Ken D'Ambrosio <ken at jots.org> wrote:
>
> Ben Scott wrote:
>
> > Hmmmm. The "MegaRAID" *I* am familar with was a brand name at one
> >time owned by AMI (the BIOS people), who later sold it to LSI. All
> >the MegaRAID cards I've used had an onboard processor (i960, I think)
> >with a built-in "XOR engine", and dedicated cache RAM. They didn't
> >touch the host's CPU for the RAID calculations at all. And they
> >certainly weren't inexpensive. Hundreds of dollars for even the
> >single SCSI channel cards, and over a thousand for the 4-channel
> >"Enterprise" product.
> >
> >
> D'oh! Humble apologies -- there was a company, RAIDCore -- sorry! --
> which was in Nashua, and bought by LSI. When I saw the MegaRAID site go
RAIDcore was (& is still) in Nashua. They were bought by Broadcom. SATA
RAID, 4 or 8 ports, hot swap, change from RAID 0,1,0+1,5,10,50 to one of the
others live. Windows and Linux drivers (with source I think). Very nice
card with great performance vs $$
- former linux test guy at RAIDcore (me).
to LSI, I added two + two and got, as usual, 3.987. I must be using a
> first-generation Pentium, 60 MHz.
>
> -Ken
> _______________________________________________
> gnhlug-discuss mailing list
> gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org
> http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
>
--
A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad
measures.
- Daniel Webster
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/private/gnhlug-discuss/attachments/20051130/722f0bd2/attachment.html
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list