Verizon (FiOS) (Off Topic?) I have it!

Steven W. Orr steveo at syslang.net
Thu Jan 26 10:29:00 EST 2006


On Thursday, Jan 26th 2006 at 08:47 -0500, quoth Paul Lussier:

=>"Steven W. Orr" <steveo at syslang.net> writes:
=>
=>> I am running with RCN and I really can't complain in the slightest.
=>
=>You're the first person I've heard say *that* about RCN.
=>
=>> I get 11Mb/s plus they don't block me from anything. The catch 
=>> is that the won't block outgoing port 25 and incoming port 80 unless you  
=>> pay them an extra $20/month for "static address" service.
=>
=>So, *if* you pay them more, you get less freedom?  That statement
=>seems backwards.  Why would they charge you to block ports?  If I'm
=>paying a higher rate for a static IP, I would expect better service
=>and more freedom.
=>
=>Are you sure it's not the other way around.  If *don't* pay them for a
=>static IP, then they *will* block various ports?

Sorry, I misspoughk. I pay an extra $20/m for the priv of allowing 
incoming 80 and outgoing 25.

-- 
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net



More information about the gnhlug-discuss mailing list