Man, they'll try anything to hack your system...
Python
python at venix.com
Sat Jan 28 17:24:01 EST 2006
On Sat, 2006-01-28 at 15:24 -0500, Dan Jenkins wrote:
> What experience have folk had tightening restrictions, like lack of
> MX
> or A or mis-matched MX/PTR pair?
> Does it still cause a lot of false rejections?
A huge percentage of my spam comes from IP addresses with no reverse
lookup. A good chunk of the remaining spam comes from roadrunner
addresses, presumably rooted zombies. In the past I got into trouble
rejecting senders without a PTR record, so even though it would clearly
be effective, I fear it would still create some false positives.
postfix/amavisd/clam are doing a good job of filtering spam, phishing
and viruses, though I have a small number of email users.
spambayes provides an effective client spam filter (spambayes.org). The
Outlook plugin is easy for Windows/Outlook folks. For everyone else,
you'd probably run it as an imap/pop proxy. (I run it as a pop proxy.)
Getting it working for those people may be more of a tech support burden
than you want to bear.
--
Lloyd Kvam
Venix Corp
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list