METROCAST BLOCKS RESIDENTIAL E-MAIL

aluminumsulfate at earthlink.net aluminumsulfate at earthlink.net
Tue Mar 14 21:44:00 EST 2006


   From: Jason Stephenson <jason at sigio.com>
   Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 20:00:00 -0500

   > it that even they don't get accepted.  In the meantime any 
   > countermeasure is a hack.

   They're actually not ways to reduce spam. There are many, many analyses 
   available on the web that show exactly how these two systems are not 

Just off the top of my head...

 * Mandating SMTP AUTH
 * Universal use of GnuPG + message signing
 * HashCash (or similar systems) http://www.hashcash.org/

In general, any spam-proof messaging system will follow these rules:

 (1) By default, do not accept any messages
 (2) Accept messages from authentic senders
 (3) Retract sender authority if/when it's used to send spam

--
PGP Key fingerprint: 1CF8 80E6 A23C F1B3 38A7  3BFD 581C 9889 A39E A73D



More information about the gnhlug-discuss mailing list