Nudder spam blocking question :-(

[Steven W. Orr]

Message from abc at def.com is below. My friend, let's call him Bob (cuz 
that's really his name) tried to send me mail and his mail to me was 
rejected as spam by the comcast server he tried to send it through. The 
comcast server is the correct server for him to be using. This is a new 
thing for me. I've never heard of an ISP rejecting mail as spam from a 
sender before, only filtering received mail. Also, by reading some of the 
stuff on comcast's (no wait spamcop's) website, they seem to have 
redefined spam as being Unsolicited Bulk Mail instead of Unsolicited 
Commercial Email.

Anyone have experience dealing with designating *outgoing* mail as spam?

-----------Message from Bob-----------------
Hmmmm.  Looks like messages to frambors are getting blocked by comcast 
spam filtering.  I'll resend from a different account, but I thought you'd 
like to know.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [mailto:mailer-daemon at comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 1:12 PM
To: abc at def.com
Subject: Returned mail: delivery problems encountered

A message (from <abc at def.com>) was received at 6 Sep 2006 17:12:00+0000.

The following addresses had delivery problems:

<frambors at syslang.net>
         Permanent Failure:
553_5.3.0_<frambors at syslang.net>..._Spam_blocked_see:_http://spamcop.net/bl.
shtml?206.18.177.54
         Delivery last attempted at Wed,  6 Sep 2006 17:12:03 -0000

     [ Part 2, Message/DELIVERY-STATUS  370bytes. ]
     [ Not Shown. Use the "V" command to view or save this part. ]




-- 
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net