Does GNHLUG need Internet-enabled calendars?

Seth Cohn sethcohn at gnuhampshire.org
Sat Jan 20 17:43:52 EST 2007


See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:LAMP_%28software_bundle%29
is my answer to you...   It's that little discussion tab at the top of
the article, Ben, in case you don't know how Wikipedia works (grin).
That page has plenty of citations and sources, (showing it's NOT
original research,) and the resulting page is pretty much neutral as
well, mentioning the variants and history in less details than the
discussion page's specifics.

On 1/20/07, Ben Scott <dragonhawk at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/20/07, Seth Cohn <sethcohn at gnuhampshire.org> wrote:
> >> Except that the 'P' in LAMP is *PERL* not PHP, which is merely a
> >> bastardization of Perl with intermixed HTML ;)
> >
> > Bzzt.  It's PHP firstmost, like it or not.
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LAMP_(software_bundle)
>
>   That article fails to cite[1] a reliable source[2] with which one
> could verify[3] any claims regarding the most common expansions for
> the "LAMP" acronym.  As such, such claims may be original research[4],
> and/or fail to represent a neutral point-of-view[5].
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources
> [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources
> [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability
> [4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research
> [5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view
>
>   I don't really care what the "P" stands for, but you do not appear
> to understand how Wikipedia works, and *that* I take issue with.
>
> -- ~~~~ [6]
>
> [6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DragonHawk
>


More information about the gnhlug-discuss mailing list