Adding a new drive / fstab
Drew Van Zandt
drew.vanzandt at gmail.com
Wed Jul 9 12:28:45 EDT 2008
>
> On 7/9/08, Labitt, Bruce <labittb1 at tycoelectronics.com> wrote:
> > Anyone got any
> > suggestions? Pitfalls on how I am thinking about things?
>
It seems to me that using any of the "traditional" mount points in this
situation is somewhat inappropriate; the new drive is intended primarily as
a resource for another machine. Given that, Thomas' suggestion of
/bladeimages is a pretty sensible one. I tend to mount shared net drives on
mountpoints like "/share", or mount a RAID on /raid, make a directory called
"share" on it, and share that directory. It makes it obvious what physical
resource is associated with the mountpoint, and you can use symlinks to
organize things in a logical sense.
I dislike the /mnt suggestion because to me, /mnt is for a foreign
filesystem, e.g. something that might be removed. On the blade server,
however, I'd probably mount the shared net filesystem under /mnt, for
reasons mentioned in VAB's reply.
--DTVZ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/private/gnhlug-discuss/attachments/20080709/d3e113a7/attachment.html
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list