Decent Graphics card / 64 bit system / imaging
Mark Komarinski
mkomarinski at wayga.org
Tue Jun 10 15:37:11 EDT 2008
On 06/10/2008 03:19 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
> NVidia makes nice cards, but the Open Source driver is buggy,
> feature-poor, and slow. NVidia has a proprietary, binary-only driver
> which is fast and has more features, but it breaks every time there's
> a kernel change, and you're SOL if you don't define "Linux" as
> "certain 2.6.x kernels on i386 32-bit".
>
Really? My x86_64 Fedora 8 desktop (with twinview) would like a word
with you. I use the Livna repository and rarely have dependency issues
between an updated NVidia driver and/or Fedora kernel. YMMV for other
distros, and it's one of the things I need to verify before converting
this box to Ubuntu. I had a harder time getting flash working than
getting my video card set properly.
> Same with ATI, except their Linux support is worse and their
> graphics hardware has sometimes had trouble keeping up with NVidia's
> latest.
>
> Intel purportedly provides full specs for their graphics chipsets,
> but the hardware itself is slow and feature-poor.
>
The Intel hardware (or drivers) stink when doing anything more advanced
than running a single monitor. I've had no end of trouble setting up
two monitors on systems.
The NVidia cards work perfectly every time, and I've been setting them
up for dual head and for 3D visualization for about 6 years. I don't
like the fact they're not open source, but this is one of the few cases
where I just hold my nose and use it anyway. There really aren't any
viable alternatives.
-Mark
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list