Session recording
Thomas Charron
twaffle at gmail.com
Mon Mar 31 07:59:56 EDT 2008
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Kenny Lussier <klussier at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Thomas Charron <twaffle at gmail.com> wrote:
> > If you want to log what a script does, your talking about needing a
> > modified version of every single shell, or only having one on the
> > system. Scripts are run in a subshell much of the time.
> That's why I am looking at the bash-paranoia patch. It logs everything
> that the shell does. It has some limitations, though, which is why I
> am looking for other solutions as well. Only having one shell on the
> box is fine in this case. People don't log into these systems very
> often, but when they do, we need to have a complete accounting of
> everything that they do, and when they did it.
But you'll have to make sure you only have one. Some scripts may
call /usr/bin/bash, others, /usr/bin/sh, others, /usr/bin/ksh, etc..
Thomas
--
-- Thomas
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list