Session recording

Thomas Charron twaffle at gmail.com
Mon Mar 31 07:59:56 EDT 2008


On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Kenny Lussier <klussier at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Thomas Charron <twaffle at gmail.com> wrote:
>  >   If you want to log what a script does, your talking about needing a
>  >  modified version of every single shell, or only having one on the
>  >  system.  Scripts are run in a subshell much of the time.
>  That's why I am looking at the bash-paranoia patch. It logs everything
>  that the shell does. It has some limitations, though, which is why I
>  am looking for other solutions as well. Only having one shell on the
>  box is fine in this case. People don't log into these systems very
>  often, but when they do, we need to have a complete accounting of
>  everything that they do, and when they did it.

  But you'll have to make sure you only have one.  Some scripts may
call /usr/bin/bash, others, /usr/bin/sh, others, /usr/bin/ksh, etc..

  Thomas

-- 
-- Thomas


More information about the gnhlug-discuss mailing list