FWIW: The bigger picture... Or why I have been asking a lot of questions lately...
Lloyd Kvam
python at venix.com
Sat Oct 10 18:08:47 EDT 2009
On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 15:20 -0400, Bruce Labitt wrote:
> Nit in solution: TCP transport time >> FFT execution time, rendering
> attempted solution non-viable
>
> Researches TCP optimization: Reads countless papers on tcp
> optimization techniques... Fails to find a robust solutions or
> methodology for problem. Tries most techniques written in papers,
> only realizing a 10% gain. Not good enough. Still needs to be faster
>
> Driven to more exotic techniques to reduce transport time. Explores
> parallel sockets, other techniques
Does a simple netcat transfer go fast enough? In other words, can
normal TCP in a simple case do the job?
If not, would you be better off "talking" ethernet? Presumably you do
not need the routing capabilities of TCP. As I understand it, your
client and server are on the same LAN.
http://aschauf.landshut.org/fh/linux/udp_vs_raw/index.html
I don't know if this is helpful. Without knowing the timings from basic
test cases, it's hard to know where to find the best point of attack.
--
Lloyd Kvam
Venix Corp
DLSLUG/GNHLUG library
http://dlslug.org/library.html
http://www.librarything.com/catalog/dlslug
http://www.librarything.com/rsshtml/recent/dlslug
http://www.librarything.com/rss/recent/dlslug
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list