Silly DNS question
Brian Chabot
brian at datasquire.net
Sat Jan 23 00:25:07 EST 2010
Thomas Charron wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Ben Scott <dragonhawk at gmail.com> wrote:
>> That would generally be considered non-compliant with the
>> requirements for Internet hosts, even though DNS can handle it.
> Interesting. My nameserver at home ends up telling me to bugger
> off. :-D Not sure which one, either our DNS forwarder, or the TDS
> nameservers. Will have to take a look.
Toying with a piece of trivia who's origin I no longer recall, I seem to
recall that some DNS servers will treat an underscore as a dash.
In an effort to test this theory, I tried doing a host lookup both ways
and indeed the results were identical:
$ host thingiverse_beta.s3.amazonaws.com
thingiverse_beta.s3.amazonaws.com is an alias for
s3-directional-w.amazonaws.com.
s3-directional-w.amazonaws.com is an alias for s3-1-w.amazonaws.com.
s3-1-w.amazonaws.com has address 72.21.202.194
$ host thingiverse-beta.s3.amazonaws.com
thingiverse-beta.s3.amazonaws.com is an alias for
s3-directional-w.amazonaws.com.
s3-directional-w.amazonaws.com is an alias for s3-1-w.amazonaws.com.
s3-1-w.amazonaws.com has address 72.21.202.194
Interesting. A dig resulted in similar answers.
I don't know if Amazon's web server would agree, but their DNS servers
seem to think they are the same.
Brian
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
| brian at datasquire.net Proprietor: http://www.JustWorksNH.com |
| Computers and Web Sites that JUST WORK |
| Work: +1 (603) 484-1461 Home: +1 (603) 484-1469 |
---------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list