Video card recommendation

[Drew Van Zandt]

21", no, but go up to 30":
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824185012
2560x1600 sounds delicious.  For the price, though, it should.

--DTVZ

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Tom Buskey <tom at buskey.name> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Drew Van Zandt <drew.vanzandt at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> My first thought on seeing them was "Oh good, rotate them and they're
>> perfect."
>>
>> Now the question is this:
>> Do I want a 1680x1050 rotated to 1050x1680, or a 1600x1200 rotated to
>> 1200x1600?  That's close enough on height that the increased total real
>> estate of the 1600x1200 is still tempting...
>>
>> --DTVZ
>>
>>
> I'm interested in the rotating thing.  I use the vertical more then I use
> horizontal.
>
> I've been fighting a failing high res CRT and looking for a replacement.
> I'm running 2 monitors at 1860x1440 each.  Try finding a 21" LCD that does
> beyond x1200.  Or a CRT nowadays :-(
>
> I was running x1600 before I upgraded Fedora and my X settings bumped it
> down to x1440.  My 40+ yr old eyes have decided to just do x1440 instead of
> upping the font size in gnome-terminal.  I'm not ready to give up another 2"
> of vertical screen resolution.
>
> I have a linux tablet that runs  800x600.  A script to rotate X11 on it
> does the trick except some gnome control apps really don't like it.  I had
> my app rotate its view instead.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/private/gnhlug-discuss/attachments/20100304/f1772058/attachment-0001.html