another reason to use adblock and noscript... or just use Linux
Thomas Charron
twaffle at gmail.com
Wed Mar 24 17:05:47 EDT 2010
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Derek Atkins <warlord at mit.edu> wrote:
> Given a standard-configuration fully-updated Windows box and compare it
> to a standard-configuration fully-updated Linux box.. The windows
> machine has significantly more holes in it during standard use.
>
>
That is false assumption which only makes one *feel* more secure. I would
give you that generally windows machines have more holes that allow someone
to *crash* the machine, however most *nix exploits which are remote
vulnerabilities will end up easily giving you a shell.
Additionally, as time goes on, I've found that older installations of a
given distributions will pretty close to 100% get compromised if left
unattended.
Linux is NOT more secure then Windows. People RUNNING Linux are
*generally* more security conscious then a person running Windows.
--
-- Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/private/gnhlug-discuss/attachments/20100324/0e55a3b1/attachment.html
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list