An Xmas present for you to peruse, comment, and mull..

[Tom Buskey]

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Jeffry Smith <jsmith at alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Joshua Judson Rosen
> <rozzin at geekspace.com> wrote:
> > "Jon 'maddog' Hall" <maddog at li.org> writes:
> >>
>
> > Basically, there's historically been confusion over whether `OSS'
> > could qualify as `COTS'--due at least in part do our own community's
> > willingness to use "open" and "commercial" as opposing terms,
> > implying an equivalence between "OSS" and "non-commercial"
> > (where the latter term is actually pretty antithetical...).
> >
> Check the DoD links I sent earlier - there should be no confusion any
> more.  DoD defines OSS as COTS now.
>
>
There is even a sourceforge for the SIPRnet:
http://www.disa.mil/forge/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/private/gnhlug-discuss/attachments/20110104/4f060945/attachment.html