Without Dennis Ritchie, there would be no Jobs
    Joshua Judson Rosen 
    rozzin at geekspace.com
       
    Sat Oct 15 14:22:15 EDT 2011
    
    
  
David Rysdam <david at rysdam.org> writes:
>
> On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:49:57 -0400, Randy Edwards <redwards at golgotha.net> wrote:
> >    One last comment/article about Dennis Ritchie. With their deaths so close 
> > together, the contrast between Dennis Ritchie and Steve Jobs seems apropos:
> 
> After rms's statement on Jobs[1] (which I basically agreed with), I was
> a little surprised there wasn't one for Ritchie.
I think I'll paraphrase Mark Weiser[2]:
    The most profound [people] are those [who] disappear.
    They weave themselves into the fabric of everyday life
    until they are indistinguishable from it.
> [1] http://www.stallman.org/archives/2011-jul-oct.html#06_October_2011_(Steve_Jobs)
[2] http://www.ubiq.com/hypertext/weiser/SciAmDraft3.html
-- 
"Don't be afraid to ask (λf.((λx.xx) (λr.f(rr))))."
    
    
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list