FairPoint DNS hijacking?
    John Abreau 
    jabr at blu.org
       
    Fri Dec 14 01:10:53 EST 2012
    
    
  
10.255.255.10 is in the 10.0.0.0/8 private address range, which is not
routed
across the public Internet. Therefore the bad server must have been local
to
whatever local network you were connected to at the time.
I'm assuming that Fairpoint has not decided to implement NAT at the ISP
layer
instead of doing a proper IPv6 rollout.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/private/gnhlug-discuss/attachments/20121214/c0c762a4/attachment.html 
    
    
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list