FairPoint DNS hijacking?

John Abreau jabr at blu.org
Fri Dec 14 01:10:53 EST 2012


10.255.255.10 is in the 10.0.0.0/8 private address range, which is not
routed
across the public Internet. Therefore the bad server must have been local
to
whatever local network you were connected to at the time.

I'm assuming that Fairpoint has not decided to implement NAT at the ISP
layer
instead of doing a proper IPv6 rollout.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/private/gnhlug-discuss/attachments/20121214/c0c762a4/attachment.html 


More information about the gnhlug-discuss mailing list