USB video?
Ben Scott
dragonhawk at gmail.com
Sat Feb 15 19:51:00 EST 2014
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Tom Buskey <tom at buskey.name> wrote:
> Why do servers still have VGA + PS/2?
From what I see, most have VGA and USB, these days.
> Because most KVMs haven't switched?
I'm not privy to their design meetings, but I would suppose:
VGA is cheaper, both to build a video source, and to build a switch.
DVI has higher connector costs, cable costs, and tighter signal
tolerances than VGA (especially at lower resolutions). VGA only needs
5 conductors for a minimal implementation. DVI may also have
mandatory and/or more complicated metadata signalling (vs VGA); that I
don't know about. Plus, as you note, KVMs already had them; changing
creates a compatibility headache to no gain.
USB vs PS/2: USB connector is flatter (important in pizza box form
factors), and cheaper, and more rugged. USB is hot-swappable, which
means it's cheaper to build a switch -- you don't need to proxy the
mouse, the way you do with PS/2. And you only need one channel from
the switch to the computer(s), since the protocol supports
multiplexing (hubs).
> FWIW, I still have a KVM that will do serial mice.
I used to, too, but it was bigger than most of the servers it would
have been hooked up to. ;-)
-- Ben
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list