Google thinks GNHLUG is spam now

[Ben Scott]

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Greg Rundlett (freephile)
<greg at freephile.com> wrote:
> Is there an SPF record?

  That would depend on the sending domain.

  For at least one of the affected messages, there is no SPF record
for the sending domain, and Google's added mail headers correctly
reflect that.

  Remember, this is a list server, and AFAIK, SPF has no good
mechanism to handle relaying.  DKIM does, IIRC, but we don't have DKIM
configured.  Never needed to.

  The only things that should have changed are the name and the IP
address.  (I suppose I could tell the new server to call itself
liberty and change DNS to match, and then the only change would be the
IP address.  Hmmm.)

  I found a form at Google for senders to report trouble.  They say,
"Thank you for your report. We will investigate this issue and take
the necessary steps to resolve it. We will contact you if we need more
details; however, you will not receive a response or email
acknowledgment of your submission."  Gee, thanks.  Keep right on not
being evil, GOOG.

-- Ben