Edit over SSH.

Tom Buskey tom at buskey.name
Fri Mar 1 11:30:34 EST 2019


Now that windows 10 has an SSH server from MS, maybe someone will update
the plugins?

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:21 AM Greg Rundlett (freephile) <
greg at freephile.com> wrote:

> I use Microsoft's atom [1] as an editor, but none of the ssh plugins seem
> to work or else aren't maintained. So, I just use sshfs in the background
> so atom can see remote files at the local mount point.
>
> Atom tries to be great, and I do like it. But it sometimes seems to leak
> memory or otherwise hang my system.
>
> [1] https://atom.io/
>
>
> Greg Rundlett
> https://eQuality-Tech.com
> https://freephile.org
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 7:38 AM Bobby Casey <beecee808 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I can't imagine any company handling release documentation like that.
>> Nope, no way!
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019, 1:16 AM Joshua Judson Rosen <rozzin at hackerposse.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You haven't lived until you've invoked emacs noninteractively from a
>>> Makefile to, say... render your documentation
>>> into end user consumables.
>>>
>>> On 2/27/19 4:02 PM, Tom Buskey wrote:
>>> > I know the feeling.  I've gotten so used to emacs for coding (python,
>>> shell) and vi for remote/quick work that I haven't been able to get into an
>>> IDE.
>>> >
>>> > Mostly I'm writing code on my desktop that will run in a VM or
>>> container or the code will build it one of those.  I can't/shouldn't put a
>>> whole development envivironment let alone emacs on it and the VM/container
>>> is ephemeral.  I'm not sure an IDE would help me much beyond what emacs
>>> already has.
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 8:17 AM Marc Nozell (marc at nozell.com <mailto:
>>> marc at nozell.com>) <nozell at gmail.com <mailto:nozell at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >     Like this? Been in base emacs for years.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Remote-Files.html
>>> >
>>> >     -marc
>>> >
>>> >     On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 7:00 PM Dan Garthwaite <dan at garthwaite.org
>>> <mailto:dan at garthwaite.org>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >         Bill is correct.  Just stick to:
>>> >         vim scp://target.host.com/.bashrc <
>>> http://target.host.com/.bashrc>
>>> >
>>> >         On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:32 PM Bill Freeman <
>>> ke1g.nh at gmail.com <mailto:ke1g.nh at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >             Resistance (like capacitance) is futile. Stay with the one
>>> true editor. Whatever nifty feature you saw, there is probably an extension
>>> to do it in emacs. (Or you can write one.)
>>> >
>>> >             On Mon, Feb 25, 2019, 2:52 PM Ken D'Ambrosio <ken at jots.org
>>> <mailto:ken at jots.org>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >                 Hi, all.  In Emacs, it's trivially easy to open a file
>>> on a remote host:
>>> >
>>> >                 emacs /user at host:/path/to/file
>>> >
>>> >                 And while I *do* enjoy Emacs, I admit that some of the
>>> other IDE/editors
>>> >                 I've seen look kind of nifty.  But opening files via
>>> SSH is really,
>>> >                 really handy -- to the point where I consider it a
>>> dealbreaker to not
>>> >                 have it.  I found Visual Code can do SSH, but you have
>>> to (at least, by
>>> >                 my reading) set up per-host profiles, etc.  Bleh.  I
>>> know that vim can
>>> >                 do it, but I'm just not a vim guy.  I'm just not
>>> interested in doing
>>> >                 some out-of-the-box thing like sshmount (or whatever
>>> it is).  So, at the
>>> >                 end of the day, anyone have an editor they enjoy where
>>> it's as easy to
>>> >                 open a file over SSH as it is in Emacs?
>>> >
>>> >                 Thanks for any thoughts you might have...
>>> >
>>> >                 -Ken
>>> >                 _______________________________________________
>>> >                 gnhlug-discuss mailing list
>>> >                 gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org <mailto:
>>> gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org>
>>> >
>>> http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
>>> >
>>> >             _______________________________________________
>>> >             gnhlug-discuss mailing list
>>> >             gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org <mailto:
>>> gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org>
>>> >             http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
>>> >
>>> >         _______________________________________________
>>> >         gnhlug-discuss mailing list
>>> >         gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org <mailto:
>>> gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org>
>>> >         http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >     --
>>> >     Marc Nozell (marc at nozell.com <mailto:marc at nozell.com>)
>>> http://www.nozell.com/blog
>>> >     _______________________________________________
>>> >     gnhlug-discuss mailing list
>>> >     gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org <mailto:
>>> gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org>
>>> >     http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > gnhlug-discuss mailing list
>>> > gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org
>>> > http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Connect with me on the GNU social network: <
>>> https://status.hackerposse.com/rozzin>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gnhlug-discuss mailing list
>>> gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org
>>> http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnhlug-discuss mailing list
>> gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org
>> http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.gnhlug.org/pipermail/gnhlug-discuss/attachments/20190301/e5d59747/attachment.html 


More information about the gnhlug-discuss mailing list