How to deal with Amazon's VPS "support" when hosting e-mail servers on Amazon, or: How to deal with Vogons?

Kyle Smith askreet at gmail.com
Wed Oct 2 08:56:11 EDT 2019


It may not be particularly helpful but in my work with AWS I tend to avoid
doing anything that can’t be done with an API to one of their services.
They’re simply not great at working any other way.

Can you use their SES service?

Where I work we have 18,000 ec2 instances but run our mail relays on
Rackspace. I don’t know if this is because of RDNS, or just for “legacy
reasons”.

Good luck with the Vogons...

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:21 PM Joshua Judson Rosen <rozzin at hackerposse.com>
wrote:

> Anyone familiar with this?
>
> I've got at work VPS hosted with Amazon right now, and am trying to get
> Amazon to drop their constrictions on outbound SMTP traffic so that I can
> get logcheck
> reports etc. out of the server. Ideally I'd also like to get them to fix
> the
> PTR record in DNS so that it points back to the server's actual FQDN
> rather than
> some goofy "ec2-xx-xx-xx-xx.compute-1.amazonaws.com" name.
>
> Amazon considers both of those things to be the same issue for some reason,
> and AFAICT has only a single form to fill out that combines them.
> I had the administrator on the account fill out the form, and got back
> this response 3 days later:
>
>         We've received your request to add a RDNS entry.
>
>         In order to make sure we process your request as quickly as
> possible,
>         please use the form provided below to resubmit the request using
>         the email address and information connected to the account in
> question:
>
>         https://aws.amazon.com/forms/ec2-email-limit-rdns-request
>
>
> Not even any mention of whether they have removed the throttling on
> traffic outbound to SMTP ports
> (through testing, I can verify that they haven't--I still can just barely
> trickle mail out).
>
> The URL that they're directing us to is the same URL as for the form that
> we already filed,
> and we've verified that the e-mail address that we gave when we originally
> filed it
> was the e-mail address listed as the admin contact.
>
> AND we know we were logged in with the the relevant admin privileges when
> we filed the form...,
> because filing it from outside the admin login isn't even
> possible--attempting to do so just
> results in an error-message: "Root Account Required: We're sorry. This
> form requires a root account".
>
> What am I misunderstanding about this process?
>
> Do they really just want the request *filed twice*? Or does this indicate
> that there's
> actually some mismatch somewhere that we're overlooking?
>
> (and, yeah--I know, there are services that both cost less *and* are less
> of
>  a hassle to deal with; for the time being I'd really like to figure out
>  how to get Amazon to actually at on this...).
>
> --
> Connect with me on the GNU social network! <
> https://status.hackerposse.com/rozzin>
> Not on the network? Ask me for more info!
> _______________________________________________
> gnhlug-discuss mailing list
> gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org
> http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
>
-- 
Kyle Smith
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.gnhlug.org/pipermail/gnhlug-discuss/attachments/20191002/5aa42269/attachment.html 


More information about the gnhlug-discuss mailing list