<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:18 PM, David Rysdam <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:david@rysdam.org" target="_blank">david@rysdam.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">"Greg Rundlett (freephile)" <<a href="mailto:greg@freephile.com">greg@freephile.com</a>> writes:<br>
> If the government actually goes through with 'open sourcing' their work,<br>
> it's actually a giant corporate handout because companies will have greater<br>
> access to publicly funded works that they can then incorporate into<br>
> proprietary works.<br>
<br>
</span>By that argument, roads are a "giant corporate handout" because shipping<br>
and schools are a "giant corporate handout" because they teach useful<br>
skills.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Software is completely different than roads or schools. But you already know that. So I don't know why you're making this argument.</div></div><br class="">Greg Rundlett<div><a href="https://equality-tech.com/" target="_blank">https://eQuality-Tech.com</a></div><div><a href="https://freephile.org/" target="_blank">https://freephile.org</a></div></div></div>