<div dir="ltr">OK, my apologies for hijacking this thread, I haven't been on a mailing list in forever but I will apply proper etiquette. Can I just ask what you mean by "top post" though?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 9:25 PM Greg Rundlett (freephile) <<a href="mailto:greg@freephile.com">greg@freephile.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto">Hi Anthony! Welcome!<div dir="auto"><br><div dir="auto">You can just reply to the list in general, but it doesn't hurt to reply-all</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">You should always start a new topic with a new thread ;-). And never top post (unless you're me and using a phone)</div></div></div><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">~ Greg</div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jun 27, 2017 8:00 PM, "R. Anthony Lomartire" <<a href="mailto:opensourcekeys@gmail.com" target="_blank">opensourcekeys@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Also sorry idk if there is an intro thread or anything, but I've been a lurker for a while this has been my first actual post I think. I don't know if I should reply all or just send my reply to the GNHLUG email address?<br><br>Anyways just quickly, I'm Tony and I'm in ad tech. We use machine learning to help advertisers optimize their ROI. At first I thought it would be lame, but at least it was a job, but gradually I have become more and more interested in ad tech and it is actually kinda cool. Ok so hiii!</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 7:55 PM R. Anthony Lomartire <<a href="mailto:opensourcekeys@gmail.com" target="_blank">opensourcekeys@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">No offense or anything but I find it amusing that one of the most active threads on this mailer has been about copying a bit of data :D</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:29 PM Matt Minuti <<a href="mailto:matt.minuti@gmail.com" target="_blank">matt.minuti@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">My muscle memory always puts the flags "-avz" (sometimes I even remember to add a P in there), so there must have been one point in time where you had to specify compression. Might still be the case.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Jun 27, 2017, 12:02 PM mark <<a href="mailto:prgrmr@gmail.com" target="_blank">prgrmr@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">My mistake. I wrote encryption when I meant compression, as I belive rsync always compresses--but I could be mistaken about that, too!</p>
<p dir="ltr">Mark<br>
</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jun 27, 2017 11:55 AM, "Tom Buskey" <<a href="mailto:tom@buskey.name" target="_blank">tom@buskey.name</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">rsync doesn't encrypt if there's no remote, as in this case.<div><br></div><div>To be pedantic, rsync to remotes uses ssh by default but it can use rsh which has no encryption. Some older versions of SSH allowed you to specify the encryption. I recall using XOR encryption for faster operation where security was not needed.</div><div><br></div><div>Encryption typically does some compression. If you compress 2x, you're doubling the bits through the pipe in the same time. If the encryption/compression computation at either end is faster than than the uncompressed bandwidth, you'll have faster throughput. That's very typical on newer multicore, high GHz CPUs.<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:11 PM, mark <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:prgrmr@gmail.com" target="_blank">prgrmr@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">Locally, cp is faster because you cannot make rsync not encrypt, but the restart-from-where-it-stopped feature of rsync makes it worth the wait.</p><span class="m_-4168248633549451087m_-8571995200344838627m_-1328966824135043619m_1304266863987305086m_6601288979295708402m_1324201240333406023HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<p dir="ltr">Mark</p>
</font></span><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="m_-4168248633549451087m_-8571995200344838627m_-1328966824135043619m_1304266863987305086m_6601288979295708402m_1324201240333406023h5">On Jun 26, 2017 3:18 PM, "Charles Farinella" <<a href="mailto:cfarinella@appropriatesolutions.com" target="_blank">cfarinella@appropriatesolutions.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="m_-4168248633549451087m_-8571995200344838627m_-1328966824135043619m_1304266863987305086m_6601288979295708402m_1324201240333406023h5"><div dir="ltr">We need to copy a large (200+GB) directory from one filesystem to another, both locally mounted. <br><div><br></div><div>I'm unsure as to what I should use to do this, cp, rsync, dd?<br><br></div><div>Any suggestions appreciated.<br><br></div><div>Thanks.<br><br></div><div>--charlie<br></div><div><br clear="all"><div><div class="m_-4168248633549451087m_-8571995200344838627m_-1328966824135043619m_1304266863987305086m_6601288979295708402m_1324201240333406023m_-2034162616874911279m_-3178690227620682922gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">Charlie Farinella<div>Systems Administrator</div><div>Appropriate Solutions, Inc.</div><div><a href="tel:(603)%20924-6079" value="+16039246079" target="_blank">1-603-924-6079</a></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div></div>
<br></div></div><span>_______________________________________________<br>
gnhlug-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org" target="_blank">gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/</a><br>
<br></span></blockquote></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
gnhlug-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org" target="_blank">gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
gnhlug-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org" target="_blank">gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
gnhlug-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org" target="_blank">gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/</a><br>
</blockquote></div></blockquote></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
gnhlug-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org" target="_blank">gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div>
</blockquote></div></div>