<div dir="auto">He might mean protected management frames?</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Mar 13, 2023, 7:36 PM Ben Scott <<a href="mailto:gnhlug@dragonhawk.org">gnhlug@dragonhawk.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">At 2023 Mar 12 Sun 09:36 PM -0400, Bruce Labitt <<a href="mailto:bruce.labitt@myfairpoint.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">bruce.labitt@myfairpoint.net</a>> wrote:<br>
>>> Why don't linux machines let me use the Wi-Fi when the router is set to frames.<br>
>>> It is supposed to be enhanced security, but it only works under windows.<br>
>><br>
>> I'm not sure what you mean here.<br>
><br>
> Perhaps the router was set to use jumbo frames?<br>
<br>
Jumbo frames aren't a security feature. They also work under Linux. They also don't make any sense on a home router, where the MTU for the WAN side will almost always be the same or less than regular Ethernet frames, let alone jumbo.<br>
<br>
-- Ben<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
gnhlug-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/</a><br>
</blockquote></div>