[gnhlug-announce] Cutover complete

Bruce Dawson jbd at codemeta.com
Thu Aug 8 07:20:22 EDT 2002


discuss at gnhlug.org is a virtual mail alias of
gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org, and the stable version of mailman
doesn't quite have full virtual hosting support.

The most unambigious use would be gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org, but
the discuss at gnhlug.org alias should continue to work. Our *goal* is to
have discuss at gnhlug.org work, but I don't want to cast that in black and
white until we see how the virtual hosting support shakes out.

--Bruce

On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 06:20, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Mark Gelinas wrote:
> > 
> > Mailman is now fully operational, and the old lists are being removed.
> > Please use the new addresses for all future correspondence.
> 
> O-key, so why did you send to 'discuss at gnhlug.org', but the mailman
> message sez to use 'gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org'?  Which one
> *should* we use?
> -- 
> #ken	P-)}
> 
> Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Golux.Com/coar/
> Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/
> 
> "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
> _______________________________________________
> gnhlug-discuss mailing list
> gnhlug-discuss at mail.gnhlug.org
> http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/private/gnhlug-discuss/attachments/20020808/11b86c25/attachment.bin


More information about the gnhlug-discuss mailing list