Ethernet question
Matthew J. Brodeur
mbrodeur at NextTime.com
Tue Aug 27 12:17:01 EDT 2002
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 pll at lanminds.com wrote:
> Ohhhhhh! Okay, I get it. So 100Mbit doesn't use 4 pair any more?
> Then why they heck are we still spending all that money on 8-strand
> cat 5? Cut the prices in half and waste half the amount resources :)
Well, 100Base-T only uses 2 pair, but I'm sure someone is still using
a "standard" that needs all 8 wires.
Of course, you still need an 8-pin plug since the signals are on pins
1,2,3 and 6. In light of that it makes sense to use 8 conductor cable,
and using cat-5 or better leaves you room to upgrade to 1000Base-T which
does use all 4 pair.
> The fiber part actually doesn't bother me, since I've dealt with it
> before. Always go MM, and use the little square connectors (sc) if
> you can, they're easier than the screw-n-twist (st) and a lot better
> than GBIC :) ( I think I got those correct :)
Almost. GBICs (GigaBit Interface Converter) are the matchbox-size
modules that plug into the matchbox-shaped holes in switches to give you
something to plug your cable into. In theory this allows you to customize
your Gig-E connections to fit your network. In practice I'd say that
about 99% of the GBICs in use are 1000Base-SX, or short-haul fiber, with
SC connectors.
It is possible to get a wide variety of modules, but in my experience
they tend not to work with anything other than the switch they were
purchased for (or with). Yet another thing that looks like a standard,
but really isn't.
- --
-Matt
All generalizations are false, including this one.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9a6X/c8/WFSz+GKMRAhsgAKCdNEwwBfixx1cjF/Pg0vnQ44Rg4gCdFVgm
8wBQLyIjcjwHM2Pm6aB2OS4=
=NGsD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list