NFS Question
Jerry Feldman
gaf at blu.org
Fri Aug 30 11:16:16 EDT 2002
Me too :-)
IMHO: NFS may not be the best solution ever designed, but it is the best
solution for Unix (et. al.) systems in a multi-vendor shop.
Years ago (before NFS), Cadmus Computer designed a network file system
tightly integrated into the kernel. This system actually used the Ethernet
protocol, and was totally transparent. It had the appropriate security
elements available at the time. Unfortunately, it was so transparent that
our VP of sales and marketing didn't know how to sell it (I think he had a
permanent rectocranial inversion). But, no matter what you use as a network
file system, you will be prone to all the problems associated with
networks. NFS has been around for 15 years or so, and has solved many of
these problems. Today, many vendors are using SAN techniques where large
disk farms are coupled to the servers through a private high speed LAN
(using high speed fibre based systems such as fibre-channel and others).
On 30 Aug 2002 at 10:14, pll at lanminds.com wrote:
> This is exactly what NFS was intended for! You should have no problem
> doing this. Though you might want to export the fs read-only so
> various clients don't stomp all over the install :)
--
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Associate Director
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list