replacement for netscrape mail

[Bob Bell]

On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 02:13:53PM -0500, Mark Komarinski <mkomarinski at wayga.org> wrote:
> The only good thing about mutt is if you're going over a ssh link to get
> where you're going (since I only read my work mail from my desktop or via
> the web, a graphical app is no problem).  Going to a remote machine, or one
> that you will access from anywhere almost requires some sort of text-based
> app.  Hence why I use mutt for my home account.  But once mutt wants to
> show me some HTML mail, things go wrong.  Or at least, not-that-easy.

    Mutt works quite well for me for HTML mail.  In fact, I even have it
configured to view MS Word docs as text.  And when viewing HTML or MS
Word as text just doesn't suffice, I can easily view the HTML in
Netscape or the Word DOC in rdesktop (to a remote Win2K TS) with just
a couple keystroke.  I'm very happy with that configuration...

-- 
Bob Bell <bobbell at zk3.dec.com>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 "Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?"
   -- Anonymous