Routing question
pll at lanminds.com
pll at lanminds.com
Fri May 9 13:44:30 EDT 2003
In a message dated: Fri, 09 May 2003 13:28:31 EDT
Marc Evans said:
>Do all of the routers on the LANs that you are attached to know how to get
>to BOTH of the CIDR blocks that you are part of? If not, then you could
>say that the LAN routing is broken, or you could say that you need to
>insure that when a packet leaves one of your interfaces that it has that
>interfaces IP address in the source. I bet tcpdump (or equiv) will reveal
>your issue(s) pretty quickly.
The network layout looks like this:
BFR
-------- ________ ________________
| eth0 |------| switch |------>| 10.251.35.1 |
| | -------- |----------------|-------->rest of the world
| eth3 |\_____ ________ |________________|
-------- | switch |------>| 10.251.37.1 |
----------------
So, yeah, both gateways now about each NIC. AFAICT, there shouldn't
be any reason why I can't have both NICs configured and accessible
from 'the rest of the world'. The only thing I can think of, is that
with a routing table which looks like this:
# netstat -rn
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
10.241.35.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 eth0
10.241.37.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 eth3
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 40 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 10.241.37.1 0.0.0.0 UG 40 0 0 eth3
0.0.0.0 10.241.35.1 0.0.0.0 UG 40 0 0 eth0
is that when trying to access something off either of these subnets,
the system can't figure out which 'default' to take. Though you'd
think it would just lob the packets out either one and wait to see if
it receives an ICMP-redirect from that gateway if it's the wrong one.
--------
--
Seeya,
Paul
--
Key fingerprint = 1660 FECC 5D21 D286 F853 E808 BB07 9239 53F1 28EE
It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing,
but I'm really actively waiting for all my problems to go away.
If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list