List Archive (Was: Re: p2p, anonymity and security)

[Travis Roy]

>>>However, I think that the posting of the whois information was not only
>>>unnecessary, but completely inappropriate to the discussion.
>>
>>  I believe the point was to demonstrate that the personal privacy Derek
>>keeps asserting is being violated is already non-existent, by his own
>>actions, and completely independently of this list.
>  
> And yet it failed miserably to do so.  I don't live at that address,
> and mail to any of those e-mail addresses will not reach me (with
> certain important exceptions, which I will not detail here).

At one point that data was correct, and from the time you input the 
data, until the time that data was changed then your privacy was not there.

> All it demonstrated is that Travis Roy is inconsiderate.

That's not a nice thing to say about a guy in a wheelchair..

oh, wrong Travis Roy, you're talking about me, not the other one.

I didn't realize posting publicly available information to a publicly 
available mailing list was considered inconsiderate.

I suggest we not allow posting of any information such as addresses 
(email or otherwise), phone numbers, web site URLs and other information 
like that without the written permission of the person that "owns" that 
information. Violators will me smacked 30 times with a sting rays tail.