CVS, Mailman, and HTML

Paul Lussier p.lussier at comcast.net
Mon Oct 25 13:23:00 EDT 2004


In a message dated: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:12:17 EDT
Bill McGonigle said:

>> Well, this is a good idea, but I have some issues with it. First, it
>> requires a "group" account for access to the mailbox. Group accounts
>> lead to problems because people can delete the e-mails, they can move
>> them to a local folder, etc. I don't think that it is a matter of
>> malicious intent, but rather, normal behavior. You read an e-mail, you
>> either file it or delete it.
>
>I think the original suggestion was for an IMAP shared folder.  You 
>control access with acl's, analogous to unix permissions.  Cyrus makes 
>this possible (in the perl sense).
>
>Just as long as there aren't any Outlook users (I'm currently working 
>on a cyrus patch to make it outlook "compatible" - every other IMAP 
>client is just fine).

We have several Outlook users, and have not had any complaints from them
about this setup.  Of course, that could be because most of these users
can't even figure out how to access their own IMAP folder, never mind a
centrally shared one :)

Oh, and fwiw, we're also using Kerberos for 'single sign on' as well.
(thought the windows side is lacking in this regard, since Outlook
offers no GSSAPI option for auth)


Seeya,
Paul
--
Key fingerprint = 1660 FECC 5D21 D286 F853  E808 BB07 9239 53F1 28EE

	It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing,
   but I'm really actively waiting for all my problems to go away.

	 If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!




More information about the gnhlug-discuss mailing list