Linux vs. BSD?
Jerry Feldman
gaf at blu.org
Fri Jun 17 11:22:00 EDT 2005
On Friday 17 June 2005 11:02 am, Peter wrote:
> First, thank you to everyone who responded (and may still respond) to my
> question regarding HD partitions. I will let you know what I end up
> doing once it is done.
>
> Below is a link to an article, which I found extremely interesting,
> about the developer of OpenBSD. So, in an effort to spur a little
> discussion, Linux vs. BSD? (I am not looking for arguments to convince
> me to stay with Linux, BTW, as that is decided.) The article makes him
> sound bitter, but does he have some valid points? Thank you.
>
>
http://www.forbes.com/business/businesstech/2005/06/16/linux-bsd-unix-cz_dl_0616theo.html
I think you will find this really a rant by Theo.
I think in the early days of Linux, BSD was certainly a better OS, and a
number of small ISPs used BSD. Today I'm not so certain.
--
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list